While waiting for the cable guy to arrive Wednesday, I watched the Columbian hostage release story unfold, first on CNN and then on MSNBC.
I had clicked over to CNN and caught the “breaking news” alert. The talking head said they were switiching to CNN International and a correspondent in Columbia. This on-the-scene reporter listed who the hostages were, who it was who held them and how long they had been held. Journalism, right?
He went on to explain the hostages had been RELEASED. The government had not yet explained the details of the whatever negotiations led to the hostage release; he was very curious because negotiations with the captors over the years had been fruitless. Nonetheless, the hostages had been released.
Click over to MSNBC.
The story there, without an on-the-scene reporter, is not of a hostage release, but a hostage RESCUE. One of MSNBC’s “experts” was on hand. He said this had to be some sort of surgical strike operation. They would not want to hurt any hostages, and the rebel camps were in remote locations that were difficult to spot. They had to know exactly where the hostages were. It would have taken a lot of daring and skill. Oh, and did we mention John McCain was in town, visiting Columbia? We don’t know what connection that had with the rescue, if any.
Well, later in the day everyone got their story straight. You see, the Columbian army had infiltrated the rebels and, using subterfuge, tricked them into believing the top rebel guy wanted the hostages moved, then the army sent in a helicopter to pick them all up.
I shouldn’t say everyone got their story straight just yet. The White House said the operation had the full support and cooperation of the U.S. government. News outlets speculate this meant the U.S. provided intelligence and surveillance. The Columbian government said, no, that’s not right. The operation was, just like Juan Valdez’s coffee, 100% Columbian.
So, to sum up: CNN’s man on the scene says hostage release, MSNBC says daring military raid. After the dust settles, the official line is some sort of hybrid: military subterfuge leading to a release/rescue. John McCain’s presence may or may not have something to do with it; the U.S. government may or may not have assisted in the operation.
I thought that something fishy was afoot, and today, I see this by Forbes, no less:
Leaders of the Colombian FARC rebel movement were paid millions of dollars to free Colombian politician Ingrid Betancourt and 14 other hostages, Swiss radio said on Friday, quoting ‘a reliable source’.
The 15 hostages released on Wednesday by the Colombian army ‘were in reality ransomed for a high price, and the whole operation afterwards was a set-up,’ the radio’s French-language channel said.
Saying the United States, which had three of its citizens among those freed, was behind the deal, it put the price of the ransom at some $20 million.
Everyone is vehemently denying there was a ransom involved. It’s going to be interesting how this shakes out, don’t you think?
Please login to rate.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
molloybe 1 day ago 2 points
Please login to rate.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
idigsarah 1 day ago 1 point
Please login to rate.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
molloybe 1 day ago 1 point
Please login to rate.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
ChangeThis 1 day ago 2 points
Please login to rate.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.